From
a distance, James Joyce's "Araby" might appear as a simple, typical Bildungsroman
in which the narrator spiritually matures. After all, when the nameless
narrator arrives at Araby, he goes through significant emotional change; he loses
a significant part of his previous excitement and feels vanity toward his love
for Mangan's sister. Instead, he feels anger at his incompetence to buy
anything and at the society that made him so. On a superficial level,
"Araby" seems to focus on the maturation of the young and naive
narrator, who suddenly tastes bitter reality. However, on the other hand, "Araby"
contains more than enough details to be much more than only a story of a
maturing child. James Joyce not only elaborated on the inner feelings and love
of the narrator, but also devoted much of the story to the description of
Dublin and Araby, the two places which symbolize the dull, insipid reality of
Ireland at the time. The actual appearances of the places show sharp contrast
with the shining images of Mangan's sister and the fantasized Araby that the
narrator had romantically formed in his mind before arriving. Contrary to the
North Richmond Street being "blind" with houses of "brown imperturbable
faces," Mangan's sister was "defined by the light" in the
narrator's eyes. The exotic image the narrator formed of the bazaar was
shattered as he saw the stalls that were "closed" and "in
darkness". The story focuses more on the settings than the characters,
whose names were infrequently revealed. Therefore, it is perhaps more accurate
to assume that "Araby" is an extended metaphor dealing with the
discrepancy between the reality and the ideal, which people frequently
encounter in their lives. In this sense, the "anonymous" narrator is
a representative of a young child entering the adult world where one's hope,
love, and expectations for something new become vain in front of the grey
reality.
There is no "Peter Pan" in the paragraph, but the thought of not being child anymore just reminded me of Peter Pan ㅋㅋ
ReplyDeleteGood work! I enjoyed this more towards the end, and I half-expected things to go off the rails because of some dog-paddling in the early stages. Perhaps, things get off to a slow start, but the end is very satisfying and fresh, and I love the idea of an "extended metaphor." The fact that the characters are rather nameless and definitely lacking in description (very much so compared to The Dead where "eyes" is mentioned 29 times), truly backs up your claim. So, while the start was a bit bulky, the ending is very succinct. And I like the Peter Pan picture.
ReplyDelete