“Where’s Waldo?” is a fairly loved book by children, who immerse themselves
into the search of a particular man with a red and white striped sweater. Time flies by, and sometimes people find themselves in a rage as
they cannot find Waldo. When looking for Waldo, people go through similar
patterns. They skim through the page full of different people, looking for the
familiar color of red and white or for the familiar face. I did too, shoving my face into
the page, eyes rolling around to find that one drawing. Frequently, you get
fooled by other Waldo imposters with similar clothes or hairstyles and find
yourself deeply irritated.
Interestingly, the seekers of Waldo do not seem to care about other
characters or objects on the same page. There might be other interesting characters
which are more favorable than Waldo, but nobody cares. Men might like a female
character better than a male Waldo, but they too look for the long-chinned man
with glasses. The obligation of having to find Waldo makes the view parochial
and people become ignorant to themselves. A better question than “Where is
Waldo?” will be “Who else is on this page?”
When
people become prepossessed with an idea, they feel a sort of an obligation to
meet the goals of that idea. Their views become narrowed down to a point to where
they only look for it. Think about teens who are about to choose their majors.
They usually have a predilection to a certain field of study. It is likely
formed by the influence of parents or society. Adults pressure teens to find
and appropriate major and society brainwashes teens about what is a favorable
job and what is not. It is similar to the book asking children to specifically
find Waldo. Due to the pressure and the shown social hierarchy of jobs, teens
feel an obligation to choose some popular majors, such as medics, law, or
economy. There is a whole scope of other majors and jobs to choose from, but
teens altogether only look for a certain thing, Waldo. When they do not get to
their goal, or find Waldo, they become outraged and depressed about it. Not
only teens, but many people do feel negative feelings by not meeting other’s
standards and expectations.
People
should not be depressed by such outcomings, when in the first place they were
not given a chance to look at the page thoroughly and find a character in their
favor. If they were asked to find their favorite character on the page, people
will have different answers of their own choice. Less people will be hopeless
of not being able to fit themselves into a set cast. More people will not feel
depressed, because they found the character they like. Of course, Waldo might
be someone’s favorite character, but there is a higher chance that he is not
considering there are about thousand other characters on the same page. Allow a
person to navigate through diverse experience and pick the one that suits his
or her character. Next time someone asks you to find Waldo, point at a
character of preference and answer, “Here he is. That’s my Waldo.”
Are you trying to torture me along with any one else who might read your blog? That font is the most awful thing I've ever tried to read. Blech! I had to copy and paste into Word.
ReplyDeleteAnyways... very impressive as an in-class essay in a short period of time, it is also impressive on your blog (though I had hoped you might elaborate a some elements). The word "myopic" seems to be part of your theme, and this is a very clever interpretation of Waldo. You are right. Waldo is usually among the least interesting people on the page, but he's the only one we look for. On that note there IS an iPhone version that has you look for other stuff in a limited time period. Kind of fun.